Research case R4

Design AI · Schemas · Product Development

Research

Design Prompt Studio

A workspace for preparing design prompts with clear source references, constraints and review checks.

Design prompt studio / research prototype

Keep design intent and constraints together, from source to prompt.

An interactive reconstruction of the product concept. Controls update a local prompt preview; no image generation service is connected.

Design Prompt StudioUntitled study / Concept stage
Local demonstration
Architectural model used as the source for a material studySOURCE VIEW / GEOMETRY REFERENCE1 : CONCEPT

The challenge

Unstructured prompting makes design intent, geometry constraints, source-image context and review decisions difficult to preserve and reuse.

Visual AI work can lose the original design intent when geometry, camera position and reference material are buried in free-form prompts. That makes results difficult to compare or repeat.

The approach

I am exploring a structured brief with explicit design controls, constraint locks and a preflight check. The designer can review the prompt before it is exported to a visual platform.

System

Select a step to see its role in the work.

  1. 01Project brief

    State the design question, source material and intended visual output.

  2. 02Structured schema

    Place the brief into consistent fields so it can be reviewed and reused.

  3. 03Design controls

    Expose camera, material and composition choices to the designer.

  4. 04Constraint locks

    Identify geometry or reference elements that should remain unchanged.

  5. 05Preflight

    Check missing inputs and conflicting constraints before prompt export.

  6. 06Platform-aware prompt

    Format the reviewed brief for the selected visual-generation platform.

  7. 07Human review

    Compare the generated result with the brief before any use or publication.

  8. 08Export

    Keep the approved prompt and its constraints available for later work.

Current position

This is a personal research prototype. The public case does not claim provider execution quality or automated scoring of generated images.

Personal research prototype. Provider execution and generated-result scoring are outside the current public case-study scope.

Next question

Compare reviewed outputs against the same brief to see which controls improve consistency without restricting useful exploration.

Knowledge graph

Follow the methods and information shared by this work and the cases below.